Issue 07 · May 28, 2026/ Intelligence

Attribution is collapsing. Marketing mix modeling is quietly back.

Why every CMO we spoke to in May is rebuilding MMM in-house, and why the agencies that owned it for thirty years are not getting the call.

By Daniel Reyes · Bureau Chief
Read · 9 min
Attribution is collapsing. Marketing mix modeling is quietly back.

We surveyed 41 CMOs in May. Thirty-two confirmed an active MMM rebuild. Of those, 28 are doing it in-house with a data scientist and a Bayesian library, not with the agency that historically owned the model.

The reason is uncomfortable for the holding companies. Once a brand has its own first-party sales data, an MMM is closer to a six-week engineering project than a six-month consulting engagement. The hard part used to be the data plumbing. The plumbing is now standard.

What we're seeing in the rebuilds: weekly cadence (not quarterly), media + non-media variables in the same model (price, distribution, weather), and a UI that lets the CFO ask 'what if' without filing a ticket.

The implication for marketers is the same one we keep writing: the role is shifting from 'I commissioned the model' to 'I operate the model.' That role is closer to the CFO than to the agency.

"Last-click died the moment iOS 14 shipped. We've been pretending otherwise for four years. The pretending is over."

// Forward this brief
Next issue · Filing Thursday 6am ET

Don't read this one second-hand.
Get the next one first.

One brief a week. Intel, tactics, and career defense, straight to your inbox before the rest of LinkedIn even knows it happened.